In 1999 Ontario Declined To Sign The Social Union Framework Agreement

The Social Union of Canada should reflect and express the core values of Canadians: equality, respect for diversity, equity, individual dignity and responsibility, mutual assistance and mutual responsibility. The Government of Canada and provincial/territorial governments will agree on a framework of accountability for these new social initiatives and investments. The following agreement is based on mutual respect between government decisions and a willingness to work more closely together to meet the needs of Canadians. The Council of Ministers will assist industry ministers by gathering information on effective ways to implement the agreement, avoiding disputes and receiving legal reports on progress on obligations under the Social Union Framework Agreement. According to Professor Alain Noel, the idea of a Canadian “social union” was “quite young” at the time of his letter in 1998. He was born in the 1990s to describe economic and social policy in Canada. However, some politicians and academics believed that the Social Union in Canada was older because it was founded in Canadian Confederation or after the Second World War. [1] By the end of the third year of the framework agreement, governments will jointly conduct a full review of the agreement and its implementation and, where appropriate, adaptations to the framework. This review will ensure significant entry and flow opportunities for Canadians and all stakeholders, including social policies, demints and voluntary organizations.

Conditional social transfers have allowed governments to introduce innovative new social programs such as Medicare and ensure they are available to all Canadians. When the federal government uses such conditional transfers, whether cost-funded or block-funded, it should cooperate to respect provincial and territorial governments and their priorities. The 1999 agreement recognized a number of principles and rights of Canadians, including the shared quality of social programs across Canada and health care in Canada with “comprehensiveness, universality, portability, public administration and accessibility.” The agreement reaffirmed the mobility rights of Canadian citizens and Canadian governments have pledged to “not create new barriers to mobility” through “new social policy initiatives.” The agreement also states that “nothing in this agreement distinguishes or disregards any Aboriginal, treaty or other Aboriginal law, including autonomy.” [2] Money has always been at the centre of the debate on social union.

Comments are closed.